106 responses to “What should I be charging for webdesign?”

  1. Dave Davis

    James, fantastic post. Really well thought out and simply put.

    I think you’re leaving one factor out though. Your personal premium. This is an extra that accounts for the company your potential client will be in in your portfolio, the cost of dealing with a seasoned professional and of course the big one, the premium on your particular unique style. Clients cannot get that anywhere else.

  2. Steph

    Super post!

    It’s sad to see there are so many out there who still think they can get a logo made for €50. Further still it’s kind of frustrating to see people scoffing at the budgets of say large scale government projects. There’s still a lot of ignorance out there around the industry.

  3. paul

    Great post James, and I agree with it all.

    Dave’s point can be also brought a little further and one should think about the size of the contract. IMHO it’s better to have a smaller number of bigger clients, who are willing to spend, rather than many smaller clients who spend less, but collectively they add up to an income. If you are guaranteed 4 weeks work, it can be a lot less hassle (in so many ways) than 4 x 1 weeks work.

    I look at every http://freelanceswitch.com/rates/ , which will brings me to my magic “per hour rate”, it’s a handy too.

    Paul

  4. paul

    some day I am going to learn english, my last comment, the last line makes 0 sense, sorry. :/

  5. Demetrius Pais

    I live in India and the article’s been really useful as far as the breakdown is concerned.
    Rates obviously do differ here. Hope someone from India writes a similar piece! Cheers

  6. uberVU - social comments

    Social comments and analytics for this post…

    This post was mentioned on Twitter by forbairt: Made a post on my blog What should I be charge for webdesign? http://bit.ly/cVqLmV...

  7. Mark Richman
  8. What price do you charge? - Page 14 - Irish SEO, Marketing & Webmaster Discussion

    [...] post by James on this very topic: What should I be charging for webdesign? | James Larkin __________________ Quality Hosting & Domains|Geek / Cool Stuff|Films.ie|Cool Sites|Discounted [...]

  9. David Winch

    Mark’s is the only sensible comment on here so far!

    The only thing that’s right about your original, James, is that you need to make a living and you don’t work for peanuts!

    You shouldn’t charge what the Client is willing to pay so much as you should charge what the Client sees is a moderate investment for the return, the value they will get from working with you.

    If you feel this modest investment is unprofitable for you, either decline to take on the work or, more likely, you haven’t helped the Client enough yet to see the full value of what they will get by working with you.

    By reading many authors on this subject, doing my own research, applying the techniques myself, and helping many people learn a better way of charging, I have identified 21 reasons why charging for your time is counter-productive for you, and 9 reasons why it is counter-productive for your clients!

    I won’t bore you with all of them, but just consider the following thoughts about time- and cost-based charging:
    * There’s an instant conflict of interests, and so it’s adversarial
    * The Client is taking all the risk
    * Frankness and openness are discouraged
    * There’s no reason for the Consultant to get better at their job
    * There’s the likelihood of a price war
    * The Consultant’s potential earnings are capped
    * Paradoxically it results in lower fees!

    Find out more at http://www.davidwinch.co.uk/dvd.htm

    You owe it to yourself and your clients to charge in a way that makes them say, “That’s a bargain. How soon can you start?” whilst at the same time you are thinking, “I’ve rarely struck such a profitable deal!”

    David

  10. David Winch

    I’ve now just seen your reply to Mark, James.

    Whilst you might have a figure you want to earn in a year, what happens if you reach it in six months?

    And what good will it do you or your Clients to have broken it down by client? Worse still by the hour?

    It is morally, legally and ethically right to charge different Clients different amounts for what for you is virtually identical effort. It is right because different Clients derive different value from the work you do.

    Base your charges on the value the Client “will” get out of working with you. In other words agree the Client’s investment – a fixed fee for a fixed scope project – before work starts, then get paid most, if not all of it before you start.

    David

  11. Mark Richman

    @James I don’t think your article is crap, in the sense that it is a lie or that it was poorly written. I simply reject the notion of hourly rates. I don’t have a figure that I want to earn…sky’s the limit! I don’t “spread” anything around either. You really need to learn about alternate billing methods. Value-based fees are NOT the same as what most people consider “fixed bid”. Jonathan Stark does a good job at explaining my point as well: http://jonathanstark.com/blog/2009/11/30/the-moral-dilemma-of-hourly-billing/

    In the UK, David Winch is the go-to guy on value billing http://www.davidwinch.co.uk/workshop.htm

  12. Louie

    Great post James. Very useful for the new guys in this business.
    Keep up the good work…

  13. LjRose

    Appreciated this. Yes. Agree completely BUT… in order to “educate” and re-train, as it were, “customers” or potential customers, we in the industry who are in the graphic art/design world need to be consistent and not back down and cave when that customer you really want refuses to pay more than minimum wage.

    Also, I do NOT work on spec at this point …EVER. Period. I learned that from my father who worked as an art director, designer, and everything in between for over 60 years (he passed away in 2006 at 95 having worked until the very last 3 months of his life).

    May I also add here that a critical skill is often missing of even seasoned and terrific visual design folks – that is usability engineering chops. This is so critical that I am now developing courses in this specifically targeted at graphic designers, web designers, et al. Even simply knowing some basics about usability testing and engineering can really make a difference in getting the price you need to get to do the job properly.

    Good article and thanks for it.

    LjRose

  14. David Winch

    James

    You decide the fixed rate by basing it on the full value the Client has told you they will get out of you fixing their problem, whatever that may be. There may also be an element of your personal value factored into this (as Dave mentioned in the very first comment) based on your uniqueness, your appropriateness and your approach. Part of your skill must be in helping the client understand this full value, and this does not mean just telling him. The client needs to be telling you. After all, like beauty, value is in the eye of the beholder!

    Very roughly your fee will offer between ten to one and twenty to one return on investment, but please, pricing is an ART not a science, and therefore not based on equations.

    Consequently there is little need to estimate the amount of work involved. You just need to give it a brief thought to ensure the deal will be highly profitable for you. You most certainly do not need accurate cost accounting! We are talking Price Based Costing here, not cost-based pricing.

    I totally agree you don’t need to tell your customers how you arrived at your fee. They aren’t interested, to be honest, so there’s never a need to tell them. All they are interested in is getting a good fix for their problem for an investment that yields a great return. If they do ask for a breakdown they are either trying to cherry pick, to drive you into a price war, or to find a handle to hang ‘no thanks’ on. The point Mark and I are making is that you shouldn’t be charging for your time.

    I strongly agree with your assertion that you should work on fixed SUM projects, and that you need to be able to quote up front. But please don’t think of fixed cost, think of fixed PRICE. What is stopping you (almost) pulling a figure out of the air as I describe above? Who is going to challenge you for doing so? You’re running your own business so think like a businessman. You are absolutely correct that every project is likely to be different and I am adding that that means “of different value” to each client, so it is highly reasonable to charge different prices.

    You slightly cloud the issue when you talk about which companies like retainer arrangements, and I’ll come back to those. All companies, big and small, will think about what you quote for fixing their problem. What convinces them when it comes to your fee is what value they will get out of having you fix their problem, and they’ll compare this with your proposed fee. The bigger the return, the more it becomes a no-brainer, assuming of course that they like you and trust you to deliver what you say you’ll deliver.

    Having also agreed a fixed scope for the project at the beginning, you are quite right to treat any additions to that scope as an additional project to be agreed and then prioritised alongside the project you are currently undertaking. You can’t do two projects for the same client simultaneously. Just don’t base your fees on your estimate of the time it will take.

    Back to retainers. A retainer should be for access to you, not for any amount of work to be “called off”. If their new problem can be solved in the space of a five or ten minute phone call or one exchange of e-mails, then great – it’s covered by the retainer fee. But if more work than this will be needed, again it’s a separate, separately chargeable project that needs to be agreed and scheduled.

    I can see that you’re trying to give designers a guideline, and the reason I’m getting ‘caught up’ in the hourly billing is because I believe that advising this as a charging model is giving the designers a ‘bum steer’, and that they should at least be able to consider an alternative way of charging that I believe is fairer to both sides.

    Before I knew better, I used to charge for my time. At one point I saw two companies in the same week, both needed a simple project. Knowing how long I thought it would take, I quoted both of them £2,000 – which I knew would be profitable for me – and they both said they’d have to think about it. I was then taught the techniques of Pricing By Value. The next week I went back to see both of them, and used this method. This time I quoted one of them £5,000 and the other £10,000. This time they both said, “That’s a bargain! How soon can you start?”

    I strongly suggest you find out more about these techniques, and try them. If they don’t work for you and your clients, OK, go back to the way you were charging.

    Do check out my website or contact me if you’d like to know more.

    I hope this helps.

    David

  15. Niall Carroll

    James, great article, alot of research and truth in there.

    @David Winch, very intersteing view on things, must try it out on my next project

  16. David Winch

    James, thanks for your kind words.

    I’m sure you’ll find your further research interesting. If you’re not aware of them already, I’d suggest Value Based Fees by Alan Weiss and Pricing on Purpose by Ron Baker. Alan Weiss has an excellent website http://www.contrarianconsulting.com and Ron Baker also runs the Verasage Institute so check out their website http://www.verasage.com where you’ll also see inputs from Ed Kless.

    Mark has already mentioned Jonathan Stark, and Boston Lawyer Jay Shepherd is a great advocate – in both senses of the word – and together with Ron Baker is part of the faculty of the Solo Practise University. http://www.gruntledemployees.com is one of Jay’s sites and contains links to his others.

    A lot of this is written for business consultants, accountants and lawyers, but it really is mostly generic. Jonathan Stark is a software developer, but his stuff is generic too.

    Niall, glad to hear you’ll be giving these techniques a try. Just be aware that it’s about more than just how you set your prices. It’s a whole way of conducting sales conversations that lead up to proposing prices based on the value of the solution.

    There’s a bit more on my own website, and I’ll be announcing the date of my next UK Workshop soon, plus there’s my DVD of the Workshop for sale on my site.

    Good luck.

    David

  17. Barry O'Shaughnessy

    Great post James,

    I’d charge a bit more than 50 quid and a six pack.

    Barry

  18. Gary Corcoran

    Interesting post and very interesting comments underneath, I would probably agree with the pricing per job situation for most of my work. I guess sometimes I have jobs come in with very tight deadlines, I put the head down and work through the night, get the job done in 3/4 of the time I quoted for but is it not right that I charge what I quoted originally?

    One problem I have with quotations is quoting on new jobs that need something I haven’t worked on before, sometimes I find it hard to estimate how long it will take to do something if I’ve no idea where to start etc.

    I am interested in outsourcing a number of projects to the lower wage areas, unfortunately I haven’t found someone reasonable and easy to work with, yet. I wouldn’t be too worried about earning a normal wage in Ireland as most of the projects that come back from outside of Ireland will need tidying up, customizing further etc. I have worked in a number of companies who have gone the outsourcing route but they have outsourced entire projects rather than the time consuming easier parts of the project and I have seen it fail time and time again.

  19. Jay Shepherd

    James,

    You’ve gotten a nice discussion going on this critically important issue. All professionals face this. Your mathematical and economics work are impressive. But despite your fine arithmetic, you’re facing two big problems:

    (1) clients don’t care about all that, and

    (2) you’re limiting your earning power.

    Clients don’t care about your costs and desired income because they’re buying a new website, not the hours you spend. They only care about the finished product, not how you got there. And they’re going to decide to pay your price if they think it’s worth it to them, not because of the number of hours you’ve spent or how much you spent on software and rent.

    You’re limiting your earning power because you’re charging for your time rather than for your talent. You obviously do good work, and I’m certain that your skill and experience enables you to work faster than someone with less talent. Which means you take fewer hours to do that work than the lesser talent does. Why should you make less as a result?

    Establish the value of your work and set your prices based on that value to your clients. It’s not easy, but it will reward you better than billing by the hour. To see how we set prices at our US employment-law firm, see my post on The Client Revolution, “How do you set your prices?”

    Thanks for getting the discussion going, and keep up the good work. (And thanks to David Winch, whose great comments got my attention.)

    Jay

  20. Fluffy Links – Wednesday February 17th 2010 « Damien Mulley

    [...] should you as a webdesigner charge? James has some [...]

  21. David Winch

    James

    Let’s just focus on you and your wife for a moment; your business lives that is!

    Put yourself in the position of the client for the moment. They want their ‘problem’ fixed. Why? Because having it ‘broken’ is painful, and having it fixed isn’t, or at least will be less so.

    There is a value to them in achieving the ‘fix’.

    There is no value to them in the way it is fixed, except that they want it fixed within a ‘reasonable’ time, and they want the solution to keep on maintaining the ‘fixed’ state. If the heart surgeon tells you that you need a triple by-pass, do you ask what size scalpel blade he’ll use, or what grade of ‘catgut’ for the internal stitches? Of course you don’t. You just want to breathe more easily and have more strength.

    Working out how long a job will take you, the consultant, is not looking at things from the client’s perspective. Why does the client what a new website, or a document translated? What will it mean to his business when it’s done? How long will it go on making a difference? What will be the cumulative effect of that difference over the long term? Asking the client these questions, and more, will allow you to understand the full value – to the client – of having a new website or translation.

    In practice, clients often don’t know the answers to these questions. It may even make them uncomfortable to be asked them, but that doesn’t mean they shouldn’t know the answers. As business owners, of course they should, and if you’re not talking to someone with that much vested interest in the business, you ought to be.

    Until they understand the difference it will make, the value it will bring, how can you? You didn’t set out to make them feel uncomfortable, but you’re doing them a big favour by getting them to think about the answers.

    Once THEY can articulate the full value of ‘fixing the problem’, your suggestion of a modest investment to realise that return will be very appealing.

    David

  22. Sean O'Grady

    I agree totally with this. The problem is that I am a student, so people think its cheaper to go with me. Quite a few people turned me down, because I expect they didnt think I was worth what I charge, or because I charge higher than most students.

    I need to earn a living too.

  23. Ronan Palliser

    Great post James – and it’s interesting to me that a similar analysis argument could be done for photography – e.g. commercial or wedding photography.

  24. Barry O'Shaughnessy

    I totally agree, €200 for a few hours work during a lecture is excellent for a student. If I don’t have a website on I can go to my parents for a few quid.

    People do expect you to work for peanuts though and always look for the cheap option!

    They think because you don’t have an office and a few staff you should nearly pay them, even though I have computers and software up to the standard of a designer.

    Great post though and great the buzz around it – I’m off to do a bit of website work during a med informatics lecture :)

  25. Sean O'Grady

    @James Yeah I think I might, I only include it out of habit. When starting out, and unsure of my work, I tended to put in student as sort of excuse for crappy work. No point looking for excuses now, if its not good enough, its my fault.

  26. Matt Finucane

    Excellent post James and some very interesting comments too. I think another big problem facing freelancers is convincing people they need to pay money to get a good website. The other big hurdle is getting paid at the end of the day even though they have agreed a price and you have completed the work.

    I don’t know what it’s like in other countries but in Ireland from my experience, people put very little value on what’s involved in building a website. We have the cowboys out there to thank for this by telling them they can get a website for as little as €50.

    They have associated the local whizz kids who are good on computers with someone who is qualified to build them good websites. They want them cheap and fast and they want quality too. The problem is in most cases you can give them something mediocre and shoddy and they will think it’s ‘brilliant’.

    Imagine hiring a commis-chef to carry out open heart surgery on you because he happens to be good at dicing chicken breast with a knife. That’s what it’s like. I’ve been there before when I was much younger and much less experienced. I think we all have. My first commercial site was a complete disaster in terms of visuals and functionality, but I still got paid for it and was very grateful to receive a few Euro as a student. We all have to start somewhere.

    I may be straying off the point of this post a bit here but this is something I feel very strongly about. How do we convince people that they are not paying extortionate prices for good websites ? They are paying for a site that follows the rules of good design, usability, accessibility, performance and graceful degradation to name but a few. They are also paying for 5 years of my post graduate experience developing websites.

  27. David Henry

    well worked out, I think we all knew this but it’s nice to see it put into words

  28. David Winch

    Matt. You ask “How do we convince people that they are not paying extortionate prices for good websites?”

    I rather hoped I’d addressed this in my post earlier this morning.

    The first step, apart of course from making sure they’ve got a budget and that you’re talking to the person who makes the decision to spend it, is for them to understand what it’ll mean, what difference it’ll make to have the new website. If you can’t get that far, walk away. If it’ll be unprofitable for you, walk away. Hang on in there and you’ll receive peanuts because of the low value of the result in the client’s mind.

    And you also say “The other big hurdle is getting paid at the end of the day.” Ask for a fee based on value, and ask for a large chunk of it before you start. You might even offer a small discount for paying in full before kick-off. Why should you take all the risk and they make no commitment? Convincing them you are the best person to do the job has to done by other means than low fees and over-generous payment terms, but I’m sure you can do that.

    And realise that as a freelance, you’re a businessman, so think like one. The client doesn’t care about “following the rules of good design, usability, accessibility, performance and graceful degradation” and your “5 years of post graduate experience” except that they want a site that does the job excellently and keeps on doing it. They want to pay for the result, and recognise that you know how to deliver it. If they knew how to do it for themselves they probably would!

    Oh, and James is right. I don’t know much about the translation market. Just trying to be inclusive!

  29. Chris Mahon

    That is a very timely topic for me as I’ve just gone freelance myself and had some of the same thoughts. I think a lot of people don’t realise that they won’t be working all the time and unless you are extremely lucky or well connected the work simply isn’t going to come to you without any effort so you need to add that into the equation as well because anytime you are trying to find work means you’re not earning.

  30. Robert Bratcher

    Great read and very helpful. All the time, people assume they know the freelance life style. But that FREE comes at a price. A price we have to work off through finding and connecting with clients. And pricing has always been somewhat of a struggle.

  31. What should I be charging for webdesign? | James Larkin « Netcrema – creme de la social news via digg + delicious + stumpleupon + reddit

    [...] What should I be charging for webdesign? | James Larkinjameslarkin.ie [...]

  32. What should I be charging for webdesign? | James Larkin » Web Design

    [...] What should I be charging for webdesign? | James Larkin [...]

  33. Leon

    Looks like I’m (or was last year!) a medium end Web Designer from your wages table! Nice to know!

    Your tax affairs should clarify a lot of this and tell you what you’re doing right or wrong. A good accountant who understands your industry is essential.

    “Perceived Value” is always important too…charge too little and you’ll get shit clients, too much and you’ll get none.

  34. Mark Richman

    One observation I’d like to share is that I (and I suspect many of you) get web app dev prospects who are unable to articulate value because of the “speculative” nature of the venture (i.e. Twitter). You can go so far as to probe “What would you consider outstanding first year revenues to be?” only to be responded to with a shrug, or you can have a wide-eyed prospect who thinks their idea is so amazing that they answer “$1 million”. You could argue that it would be negligent to charge $100,000 for their million dollar idea, knowing that it’s a crap shoot, and the client could try to hold you accountable for their ultimate lack of success. Also, any suggestions as to how to avoid “performance based payment” discussions would be helpful to the group.

  35. David Mahon

    Really insightful post. A worthwhile read for any self-respecting freelancer in Ireland. Cheers Jim.

  36. Danny Baggs

    Great thought provoking post.

  37. Dan

    Totally agree, good read for any freelancer. It’s so easy to be talked into lowering your rates these days. Thanks!

  38. Eduardo

    This is exactly what I needed coming into my second full year of operation in the Freelance world. Got to revise my prices after coming in competitively to get my portfolio established.

  39. Holly

    Great resource for pricing! Here is another one: 12 Tips on Pricing your Web Work http://alturl.com/k79k

  40. Albert

    Well, that’s what you need to charge in order to break even, but more realistically, as someone said, things are worth as much as others are willing to pay for them, and that’s much more difficult to find out.

  41. daniel

    great post! thank you!

  42. Will

    This is exactly the stuff I have been screaming. Rocking

  43. Chris Mahon

    What do you guys think about lowering your prices if there is a possibility of getting a lot of work from a client? Just wondering what the general opinion is on that.

  44. Chris Mahon

    Hey James, yea totally agree with the promise of potential for more work :) I have a situation right now where I’ve been asked if my rates are negotiable so I’m just trying to figure out what to do. I’ve worked with them before (I wasn’t freelancing at the time so my rates were lower) so I know they are good guys to work with, just trying to balance up the cost things because my day rate is what it is for a reason, I need to earn this to make a living.

  45. Paul

    @Chris – I have tried it before and it has never ever worked out. Generally your “just this once” price will be the expected rate for future projects.

    @Albert – I completely agree with you. If you have a client that has budgeted 10k for their project and you quote them 4k they won’t appreciate the savings… they will go to someone else because of a perceived higher value. And obviously if they have 4k budgeted and you quote them 10k, they wouldn’t accept your bid either.

    As far as finding out what their expected budget is I normally just ask them “what is your budget for this?”. As a general rule I try very very hard to not be the first person to say a number. Unless I say “just so that we’re all on the same page, if you think that this is going to be a few hundred dollars then I will have to refer you to the local high school that I work closely with. There will be students who can probably handle this for that budget”. This approach works pretty well for me, but I am interested in hearing how other people find out a potential client’s budget.

  46. kate

    The figures are spot on! A really good way to look at pricing.
    Albert – Clients often have a budget in mind so discuss what they need and if it can all be done within their price mark … if not then offer a solution that meets some of their needs but is at a price more agreeable for them. A phased solution can sometimes be useful …

  47. Mark Richman

    Paul,

    I picked this one up from my home theater vendor, who said early in our conversation, “our typical job is $80,000.” That statement is intended to both imply credibility/quality, and hint to the customer that they should be prepared to spend big or look elsewhere. I ended up spending only $20,000 with them :)

    Mark

  48. Mark

    That was a worthwhile read.

    Good reference to add to a couple of other models for working out rates.

    Cheers.

  49. What should I be charging for webdesign? | mStudiosTALK

    [...] The following link goes to James Larkin’s article on figuring out how much to charge when doing webdesign. It is a great article, giving you a solid foundation for things to take into consideration. Even though it’s not listed in US dollars, it is easily adapted for other countries : What should I be charging for webdesign? | James Larkin [...]

  50. rickdelux

    Nice article and pretty much spot on with how I have handled my freelance side over the last 10 years.

    I’ve done all kinds of pricey models over the years, and nearly every time I get screwed on the value based pricey model. The lump sum contracts have either resulted in too much time spent on my side, way too much time spent on my side, clients who didn’t pay, or clients who are a huge pain in the ass.

    I’ve discovered that giving them an hourly fee and continously updating them on what it is costing as been a) highly profitable for me, b) cost/budget conscious for the client, c) a PLEASURABLE experience for everyone. I do vary my hourly fee based on the client and the work involved.

    The hourly model works for Lawyers and the last time I checked my buddy Jeff wasn’t hurting for money.

  51. Alfredo

    I live in Italy and the situation is a little bit harder. The people prefer to spend 600 euros for a Iphone and you can hear them say (in italian obviously :-) :”For my site I wouldn’t to pay more than 300 euros” and then follow with two hundreds of requests!
    However, if you’re not a great company, as said Albert, the client make the price (with some limitations)!
    Thanks for this great post.

  52. dex

    Nice one.
    I fully agree – I did exactly the same calculation myself, with similar findings.
    Whilst I acknowledge that most of the time there is effort involved in justifying my quotes, I do wonder then if i need to target a different market, where professionalism and professional rates are required and valued.

  53. reb

    great post indeed, thanx

  54. Abhilash Thekkel

    Hi, i’m a freelancer from India. and this post is worth a read. Thanks for posting.

  55. David Winch

    I’ve already said pretty much all I wanted to say on this subject, but Rickdelux’s line about lawyers needs a further comment.

    The hourly model might be widely used by lawyers, and widely accepted by clients who feel they’ve been presented with Hobson’s Choice. But it is used because lawyers generally don’t know and seem not to have looked for better ways, at least not this side of the pond. And how many of their clients have you heard saying “That’s a bargain” or “I must get my lawyer on the case asap because it’ll be the most cost effective course of action”?

    Follow the link in Jay Shepherd’s post from the 15th (above) and see how enlightened US law firms are gaining considerably from the value-based model, and their clients even more so.

  56. Gianni Ponzi

    Hope you enjoyed your “blackout”. Great post.

    Another one to think about might be the joint venture request. Where everyone wins except you :-)

  57. Alan

    Personally I like the hourly charge based on experience. I have come across lots of clients that just keep changing the goal post after you have given a quote.

    The benefit of the hourly rate is:
    1. As you build your portfolio you get a good idea how long a project will take based on your recorded time with previous projects.
    2. You can give a good on the spot price within 10% of the final project.

    It must also be made very clear to clients that changes could incur additional charges. For example I have one client change the header image 18 times (among other things). The project that should have taken 3 weeks ended up taking 4 months.

    How would you account for the loss of time with fixed pricing per project!!

  58. Bookmark Broker

    I love these kinds of posts, especially early in the morning, when it gets my brain awake and thinking.

    I agree 100 percent with the sentiment here James. I also agree with Mark regarding “value pricing” (I think I used a hybrid of the two, as you can tell from my comment here: http://jonathanstark.com/blog/2009/11/30/the-moral-dilemma-of-hourly-billing/

    I say, charge what you’re comfortable charging, and deliver an excellent product to the customer within the agreed time frame. Nothing else matters. It really doesn’t.

  59. A question of rates « John Rainsford

    [...] was reading a blog post over on jameslarkin.ie regarding calculating your hourly rate if you’re a freelancing web designer. Even though I [...]

  60. Justin

    In an ideal world with ideal clients working on ideal jobs, value based pricing is AWESOME! In reality clients change their mind about this that and another. A 1 week project stretches to 2 months and a simple color change has gone through 5 revisions. The client has taken 5X the amount of time you thought they would have because of unnecessary meetings, phone calls, and last minute changes. While I know that within value based pricing there are terms and policies to write within your estimate that can help you avoid this snafu; but in the end almost every project is like this to an extent. So why default into the fine print on every job as opposed to making the client understand from the beginning that TIME= MONEY. If you think that you are selling yourself short charging hourly you can always raise your rate. Seriously though, always.

  61. David Winch

    When I read comments like Justin’s, I start to wonder if people aren’t jumping to ‘getting the deal’ too readily.

    If you don’t have the information to agree a fixed scope for the project, and this is a result of the client not knowing quite what they want, then why not go for an initial project to set the fixed scope for the ultimate project?

    This initial project won’t be doing any of the final ‘problem solving’ but it will be getting the client to think and make decisions before you embark on the lengthy ‘big one’. The value of the initial project will be in getting the final project completed sooner and thus the client company reaping the benefits of that sooner.

    Sure, the client may say they can’t make their mind up until you’ve shown them the ideas working, so this could be a ‘pre-initial’ project, again with a value to the client in terms of getting the final project delivering benefit quicker and with less fuss.

  62. Henry Brown

    Thanks for the info. Definitely put some things in to perspective for me.

  63. Alberto

    Probably the key to successful pricing is diferentiation. Yes, you can hire a high-schooler to develop a basic website for $100, but that will not be the same as a professionally developed one. Also, it’s possible to set up a plain vanilla WP install in a couple of hours – and that’s a website too. The thing is getting the customer to see that he gets what he pays for. It might be trickier for artwork, as it is a matter of taste.

  64. Shikeb Ali

    First I should introduce my self, as I’m almost a rookie amongst you people. My Name is Shikeb Ali, and I work as a Web Designer for Jang Group aka Geo TV (Pakistan largest media group).

    Now about the wages, according to the above mentioned table Ireland’s junior graphic designer is earning 12 times higher than me. So its a disaster for good designers when you are not paid enough. Pakistan facing the “Brain Drain” situation just because of this low wages as European Countries are paying them according to their work ability.

    Freelancing is good in asian countries as freelancer get paid in Dollers or Euros, for example in Pakistan if someone get paid $100, it will turn in Rs. 86,000 which is way above a common designers monthly salary here.

  65. WallMountedHDD

    Good article! Outside of the discussion of hourly vs. other, I would like to vent about my personal observations regarding many freelancers I’ve met who do charge hourly.

    I know I am going to get a lot of flack for this, but any freelancer web designer/developer who charges more than $15-20 an hour who A) doesn’t have a 4-year degree, B) doesn’t have at least 3-5 years experience already, and C) who can’t do at least a little of everything (design, front-end, back-end, DB, programming, server admin) is somewhat greedy.

    Most every freelancer I bump into, most of which are pretty decent (which is far different from phenomenal), usually charge between $30-50/hr…sometimes when they start out, and sometimes more! I honestly met a guy who charged $90/hr. This is an inaccurate estimate, but give or take, $30/hr could potentially be almost $62k a year at 40hrs a week into 52 weeks. What entry-level person in his/her 20′s in this economy seriously thinks that’s ok to demand? Charging that much once you’ve gained solid tenure is reasonable, and charging more once you’re a seasoned expert with clients begging for you will be an eventuality. But wanting to make an hourly rate that can equate to $60-100k a year for a freelancer who is less than 5+ years into it (and, no, those so-called nine years of experience you think you have because you knew what HTML was all along and tinkered with Angelfire in 1999 don’t count – I am tired of seeing web designers exaggerate how long they’ve been doing it) is just freaking laughable. But it’s what I keep seeing.

    I worked at two companies after four years of college and made about $30k before taxes at each (this article says this is the low end for a developer, about €20,000 = $33k, which is understandable for entry). That’s realistic. Years down the road I can eventually climb to what this article says is the high end for a developer, about €55,000. Start low. Climb. Just like in ever other profession.

  66. Shikeb Ali

    Hi James, I agree with you about the cost of the living in Ireland but still life is much better there as compare to here.

    Yeah, right here in Pakistan most of the companies so called “Software houses”, are working on project basis, they grab projects from freelancing websites, work on it and in the result they get paid 15times above the local cost of the project.

    Myself thinking about doing freelancing as it give you much more work exposure (+ $$) than working for a single domain.

    p.s: thanks for replying :)

  67. Jo Sturgess

    Thanks for a really informative post. I’ve read a few posts on this kind of topic and none of them were as useful and informative as yours. I’m nearing the end of a graphic design course, and although I’m not currently considering working as a freelance designer this page will definitely be bookmarked for future reference :)

  68. Damian Jakusz-Gostomski

    Excellent post!
    Great to see this issue tackled from a differant angle. I especially like the table of ideal “salary” and hours per week, first time I’ve seen something like that :)

  69. agence web

    Thank you very much for the post. The data are just very accurate

  70. Dave

    Very well put James.

    I get the same question from a lot people starting in design.
    Your post helps them understand more realistically what they actually need to charge to break even.

    I think from a client perspective the issue is we have people have dabbled in Photoshop and then give some sort of WYSIWYG editor a go to make a site. Suddenly they declare themselves web designers.
    Because all the coding is never seen the client doesn’t really know what they are paying for. They will never know if someone made their site using tables.

    I think part of a good web designers job is to educate the client on what they actually deliver and the difference between a professional interested in helping the client and someone just having a go.

  71. Lisa Raymond

    Fantastic post, James, very well written! It is sad when people expect a logo for $99 in the U.S. as well, but the reason they expect it is because there are people out there either undercutting the industry or treating a logo project like a production project and charging based on quantity, not quality. That trickles down to the web projects, brochures, flyers, etc. and encourages tire-kicking. The most infuriating part I can’t explain or figure out to combat is the people who charge so little get all the jobs, and by the time they come to one of us to fix the bad design, the customer is up in arms over what the real pricing is to make the fix.

    It’s becoming far more apparent in the U.S. most of our profession absolutely requires referrals and word-of-mouth advertising to survive against these odds. As professionals, we have to continue to not only set ourselves apart from our competition based on our strengths, but also support one another and continue to educate our clients through our writings, blogs, and our accomplishments the exacting differences between the hobbyists and the professionals.

  72. Johan

    It is so sad that the internet is eating her development skills alive. I believe that software is not for free and it is bad that my competition comes from India and other places in the low-earnings world, there where the local carpenter or painter is protected by law. I don’t mind competition, I do mind that I have many costs by law (Germany) and that my competition has not (or lower). In other words: if you are good at something, don’t do it for free.

  73. Something good can’t come for free | The world of DjeeDjee, no matter what blog, as long it matters

    [...] would only like to recommend the following reading what should i be charging for webdesign. I think it is time that a crusade is started (against who?). This, to protect all creativity that [...]

  74. Something good can’t come for free | DjeeDjee, blogs in English about IT Development

    [...] would like to recommend the following reading what should i be charging for webdesign. I think it is time that a crusade is started (against who?). This, to protect all creativity that [...]

  75. CSS Brigit | What Should I Be Charging for Webdesign?

    What Should I Be Charging for Webdesign?…

    An excellent and detailed breakdown of how to hit your target income as a freelance web designer….

  76. How much for a website / what should I charge ?

    [...] question by people new to the business. It was mentioned by smashing mag again at the weekend What should I be charging for webdesign? | James Larkin And I've had a lot of comments interest in it from people Of course this is a shameless plug of [...]

  77. Schrumpfschlauch

    Very good artikle. I like the table with the earning and what I must get in the hour :-) thx a lot dude..

  78. Alphabetix

    Hi James,
    I totally agree that understanding the amount of time that is required to complete a project is necessary for coming to a reasonable quote. We also make sure that we have a pretty concrete contract so we don’t get caught up in the 20 revisions as part of the included price deal.
    It’s great that value is part of pricing, but in this industry, it is reasonable to think that time = value to some extent. To un-tech-savvy people, a website is a website, and no amount of explaining the difference between clean code and messy code is going to make them see the value of a better designer (haven’t we all tried that to some extent?). Some people can’t get past the up front cost. They think the value (the return profits, visitors, etc) exists whether they pay $500 or $5000 for a site. Real designers know different, but getting everyone on the same page is tough. And while it sounds great to say that clients who don’t understand aren’t the right client for you, in a highly competitive market, this may not be reasonable.

  79. David Winch

    Aphabetix

    Understanding very approximately the amount of time that is required to complete a project enables your rough calculation of profitability (hopefully ‘very’!), but is not a great basis for establishing the price you charge.

    I agree, once you have agreed a price, based on the value the customers understands the project will deliver, it is very useful to have a signed written agreement of the fixed scope as well as the fixed price for the project.

    However, the notion that time equals value is quite erroneous, and should be kicked into touch by all concerned. I am not saying that a more skilful coder will not produce a more valuable result, nor am I saying that they are unlikely to take more time to do so. But I am saying that a more valuable result is more valuable – Sounds stupidly simple, because it is, but not everyone seems to grasp this!

    If you are a skilled coder who produces ‘clean code’ you also need the skill to help your customers understand why a cleanly coded site is more valuable to them than a messily coded one. Notice that I didn’t say “tell them it’s more valuable.” You have no value to the customer as a ‘better designer’. It is your ‘better designs’ that are valuable!

    If you can’t get customers to see the difference in return (aka value) between a ‘clean code’ and a ‘messy code’ site, how can you ask different prices for them? ‘Real designers’ may ‘know different’ but that’s not the point. It’s not until they can help the customer to ‘know different’ that the different prices will seem reasonable to the customer. “Oh, the customers don’t understand!” is not an acceptable excuse. If you want to sell your ‘better’ services at ‘better’ prices, you have to help them understand, and it may well be ‘tough’! If you don’t, they’ll reasonably say that anything over $500 (to use your example) is too expensive.

  80. cooljaz124

    Hey, thats a very nice post. Very useful. But, i have a doubt to ask. May be too simple , What is the difference between Junior Graphic Designer ,Middleweight Graphic Designer ,Senior Graphic Designer,
    Creative Director ,Junior Web Designer, Web Designer, Senior Web Designer and Web Developer. Do any one have skillset or experience related to each designation ?

    Thanks once again.

  81. Brett Widmann

    Thanks for writing this insightful post. I agree with all of the points you made, especially the student example. I never understood why people think they can get a quality website on the cheap with all the bells and whistles of enterprise level sites.

  82. Alan | Firefly Web Galway

    Really good discussion you’ve got going here, some designers starting out actually have a good idea about how to charge, but don’t hammer down requirements at an early stage and then end up doings weeks worth of “minor changes” that they’re not getting paid for. The following comic I’ve seen recently pretty much sums it up!

    http://theoatmeal.com/comics/design_hell

  83. David Winch

    Awesome comic clip, Alan.

    So how is everybody going to stop this happening?

    Telling the client at the outset that you’ll review and bill every week and they can request whatever changes they like doesn’t look to me as though it’s going to work!

    Fixed-scope is needed so that you can say “If it’s outside the scope, it’s a separate, separately chargeable project” when you should. But you can only have a fixed scope when the client fully understands their own issue.

    You maybe need a preliminary, chargeable project to help them arrive at that understanding so you can (fixed) scope the main project.

  84. Mark Richman

    David, would it be advisable (from the Value Pricing perspective) to charge time & materials for such a “discovery” project? If not, how can one determine a fixed price for such a project?

  85. David Winch

    Mark

    You could charge time and materials – plus margin – for the ‘discovery’ project, but this will put you in a pretty weak position for using value-based pricing for the main project later.

    It wouldn’t be easy IMHO to arrive at a value-based price for the discovery project in isolation. I think in value terms it’s all part of the main project. You’re wanting to ring-fence its scope to prevent ‘scope creep’.

    Nevertheless you’ll need a price so that you can get paid for the initial work up-front, so just choose any fee that seems reasonable and is profitable, maybe between 10% and 25% of what you feel the overall price should be. You will already have agreed the value of the project, you’re just investigating the detailed scope of the main project.

    When presenting the value-based price for the main project you can point out that part of it has already been paid, so you just need 50% of the remainder in order to get started.

  86. Mark Richman

    David,

    If I understand you correctly, I am to take a reasonable guess as to the value of the project, say $50,000. Then charge $5,000-$12,500 for the discovery. Then, when the scope has been wrangled to *my* satisfaction, collect 50% of the remainder ($22,500-$18,750) to commence implementation, and the other 50% at some future date?

    I’m okay with all that. What the client may not be okay with is paying before the job is “done”, and the associated ambiguity with which “done” is defined, especially in technology projects.

    Thanks,
    Mark

Leave a Reply